Skip to main content
Web3 QA
Xrpl

How to QA Native XRPL Smart Contracts (Hooks)

Last updated: October 29, 2025
Comprehensive Guide
#guides#hooks#security#testing#xahau#xrpl

How to QA Native XRPL Smart Contracts (Hooks)

Testing Hooks on the Xahau Ledger represents a paradigm shift for developers coming from the EVM ecosystem. Unlike Solidity contracts deployed on Ethereum, Hooks are native smart contracts written in C or Rust, compiled to WebAssembly, and executed directly by the XRPL protocol. This guide outlines the strategic approach to QA for this unique testing environment.

🔗 New to XRPL Testing? Start with our XRPL Testing Ecosystem Guide to understand the fundamental differences between Native XRPL and EVM sidechain testing.

Understanding the Hooks Testing Landscape

Before diving into the testing strategy, it's important to understand what makes Hooks testing different:

What Are Hooks?
Hooks are small, efficient smart contracts that "hook into" XRPL transactions. When a transaction occurs on an account with an installed Hook, the Hook executes automatically, allowing it to:

  • Accept or reject the transaction
  • Modify transaction outcomes
  • Update account state
  • Trigger additional transactions

Key Differences from EVM Testing:

  • No Local Blockchain Fork: You test against live testnets (Xahau Testnet) or a local xahaud node
  • Wasm Binary Deployment: Your Hook is compiled to WebAssembly before deployment
  • Transaction-Driven Testing: Tests simulate real transactions that trigger Hook execution
  • Limited Tooling Maturity: Automated security analysis tools are still emerging

Step 1: Setting Up Your Test Environment

A proper Hooks testing environment requires three core components:

1. Test Runner: Jest or Similar Framework

Jest provides the test structure, assertions, and reporting you need for automated testing. It's the same tool you'd use for any JavaScript testing, making it familiar for web developers.

2. Client Library: xrpl.js

The official JavaScript library for interacting with the XRP Ledger. This handles:

  • WebSocket connections to the ledger
  • Transaction signing and submission
  • Account management
  • Result parsing

3. Test Ledger: Local xahaud or Xahau Testnet

  • Local xahaud: A full XRPL node running on your machine for fast, isolated testing
  • Xahau Testnet: The public test network for integration and pre-deployment testing

📚 Setup Details: Our Native XRPL Testing Toolkit provides complete installation instructions for all three components, including Docker configurations for xahaud.

Verification Checklist:

  • [ ] Jest installed and configured
  • [ ] xrpl.js library available in your project
  • [ ] Local xahaud node running OR access to Xahau Testnet
  • [ ] Test wallets funded with testnet XRP

Step 2: Static Analysis & Code Review (The Critical Manual Step)

Let's be honest: automated security tooling for Hooks is not as mature as Slither for Solidity. This is the reality of working with cutting-edge technology.

What This Means for Your QA Process

Manual code review is your primary security defense. You cannot rely solely on automated tools to catch vulnerabilities in Hooks written in Rust or C.

Your Manual Review Checklist

When reviewing Hook code, focus on these critical areas:

1. Transaction Validation Logic

  • Does the Hook correctly identify transaction types?
  • Are all edge cases handled (partial payments, multi-sig, etc.)?
  • Can an attacker craft a transaction that bypasses checks?

2. State Management

  • How does the Hook read and write state?
  • Are there race conditions in state updates?
  • Can state be corrupted by malicious input?

3. Resource Limits

  • Does the Hook respect the execution budget?
  • Are there unbounded loops that could cause timeouts?
  • Is memory usage within Wasm constraints?

4. Authorization Checks

  • Does the Hook verify the transaction sender correctly?
  • Are privilege escalation attacks possible?
  • Can unauthorized accounts trigger critical Hook functions?

5. Integer Arithmetic

  • Are there potential overflow/underflow issues?
  • Are currency amounts handled safely?
  • Is precision maintained in calculations?

Emerging Tools

While not as comprehensive as EVM tooling, these resources can assist:

  • XRPL Hooks Builder: IDE with syntax highlighting and basic validation
  • Hooks Debugger: Command-line tool for inspecting Hook execution
  • Community Audits: Engage with the XRPL Hooks development community for peer review

Bottom Line: Treat every line of Hook code as security-critical. If you're deploying a Hook that manages value, budget for a professional security audit (see Step 5).

Step 3: Writing Unit Tests

Unit tests for Hooks verify that your Hook's logic works correctly in isolation. Here's the testing pattern:

The Test Flow

Your unit tests will follow this structure:

describe('MyHook Behavior', () => {
  it('should accept valid transactions and reject invalid ones', async () => {
    // 1. Connect to local xahaud testnet
    const client = new xrpl.Client("ws://localhost:6006");
    await client.connect();

    // 2. Create and fund test wallets
    const hookAccount = xrpl.Wallet.fromSeed("sTest123...");
    const senderAccount = xrpl.Wallet.fromSeed("sTest456...");

    // 3. Deploy the compiled Hook to hookAccount
    const setHookTx = {
      TransactionType: "SetHook",
      Account: hookAccount.address,
      Hooks: [{
        Hook: {
          CreateCode: wasmHexString, // Your compiled Hook
          HookOn: "0000000000000000", // Trigger conditions
          HookNamespace: namespace,
          HookApiVersion: 0
        }
      }]
    };
    await client.submitAndWait(setHookTx, { wallet: hookAccount });

    // 4. Send a transaction designed to trigger the Hook
    const paymentTx = {
      TransactionType: "Payment",
      Account: senderAccount.address,
      Destination: hookAccount.address,
      Amount: "1000000" // 1 XRP
    };
    const result = await client.submitAndWait(paymentTx, { wallet: senderAccount });

    // 5. Assert the outcome
    expect(result.result.meta.TransactionResult).toBe("tesSUCCESS");
    
    // 6. Verify Hook-specific effects
    const accountInfo = await client.request({
      command: "account_info",
      account: hookAccount.address
    });
    expect(accountInfo.result.account_data.Balance).toBe(expectedBalance);

    await client.disconnect();
  });
});

What You're Testing

Transaction Acceptance/Rejection

  • Does the Hook accept transactions that meet criteria?
  • Does it reject invalid transactions?
  • Are the rejection codes correct (tecHOOK_REJECTED, etc.)?

State Changes

  • Did the Hook update its state correctly?
  • Are Hook state objects (HookState) persisted as expected?
  • Can you read back the state after the transaction?

Transaction Modifications

  • If the Hook modifies the transaction, are changes correct?
  • Are emitted transactions (via emit()) formed properly?
  • Do side effects occur in the right order?

Test Data Strategy

Create comprehensive test scenarios:

  • Happy path: Normal, expected transactions
  • Edge cases: Zero amounts, maximum amounts, boundary values
  • Invalid input: Malformed data, wrong transaction types
  • Attack scenarios: Re-entrancy attempts, overflow exploits, unauthorized access

Step 4: Integration Testing

Integration tests verify that your Hook works correctly with other native XRPL features and accounts.

What Integration Testing Covers

Hook-to-Hook Interactions

  • If multiple accounts have Hooks, do they interact correctly?
  • Can one Hook trigger another?
  • Are state changes synchronized?

Native XRPL Features

  • Escrow: Can your Hook interact with time-locked XRP?
  • Payment Channels: Does your Hook handle channel claims?
  • Trust Lines: Can your Hook manage IOU currencies?
  • NFTs: Does your Hook work with NFToken minting/burning?
  • Checks: Can your Hook interact with the Checks amendment?

Multi-Party Scenarios

  • What happens when multiple signers are involved?
  • How does your Hook behave in a multisig setup?
  • Are there race conditions with concurrent transactions?

Integration Test Example

it('should interact correctly with Escrow', async () => {
  // 1. Create an escrow that releases to the Hook account
  const escrowCreate = {
    TransactionType: "EscrowCreate",
    Account: funderAccount.address,
    Destination: hookAccount.address,
    Amount: "5000000",
    FinishAfter: futureTimestamp
  };
  await client.submitAndWait(escrowCreate, { wallet: funderAccount });

  // 2. Wait for escrow to mature (or simulate time in local testnet)
  // ...

  // 3. Finish the escrow
  const escrowFinish = {
    TransactionType: "EscrowFinish",
    Account: hookAccount.address,
    Owner: funderAccount.address,
    OfferSequence: escrowSequence
  };
  const result = await client.submitAndWait(escrowFinish, { wallet: hookAccount });

  // 4. Verify the Hook processed the escrow correctly
  expect(result.result.meta.TransactionResult).toBe("tesSUCCESS");
  // ... additional Hook state assertions
});

Integration Testing Best Practices

  • Test on Xahau Testnet: Once local tests pass, run integration tests against the public testnet
  • Simulate Real Timing: Use actual time delays for time-locked features
  • Monitor Network State: Check ledger state before and after test runs
  • Clean Up Resources: Delete test Hooks and close channels after tests

Step 5: Pre-Deployment Checklist

Before deploying your Hook to mainnet, complete this final QA checklist:

1. Comprehensive Test Coverage

  • [ ] All unit tests pass locally
  • [ ] Integration tests pass on Xahau Testnet
  • [ ] Test coverage includes all Hook functions
  • [ ] Edge cases and failure modes are tested

2. Public Testnet Validation

  • [ ] Deploy the Hook to Xahau Testnet
  • [ ] Run the full test suite against the testnet deployment
  • [ ] Monitor Hook performance under realistic load
  • [ ] Verify gas costs and execution budgets

3. Manual End-to-End Testing

  • [ ] Use Xaman wallet to interact with your Hook manually
  • [ ] Test all user workflows end-to-end
  • [ ] Verify wallet displays correct transaction previews
  • [ ] Confirm transaction signing experience is smooth

4. Security Audit

  • [ ] Engage a security firm that specializes in Wasm and XRPL Hooks
  • [ ] Provide auditors with full source code and test suite
  • [ ] Address all findings before mainnet deployment
  • [ ] Publish the audit report for transparency

Recommended Auditors:

  • Firms with XRPL-specific experience
  • Auditors familiar with Rust/C and WebAssembly security
  • Teams that have audited other Hooks projects

5. Documentation & Monitoring

  • [ ] Document all Hook behavior for users
  • [ ] Set up monitoring for Hook execution on mainnet
  • [ ] Prepare incident response plan
  • [ ] Establish communication channels for security disclosures

Step 6: Mainnet Deployment Strategy

Phased Rollout Approach

Don't deploy to millions of users on day one. Use a phased strategy:

Phase 1: Limited Beta (Week 1-2)

  • Deploy Hook to a single test account
  • Invite trusted users to interact
  • Monitor closely for unexpected behavior

Phase 2: Controlled Expansion (Week 3-4)

  • Gradually increase user access
  • Monitor performance and error rates
  • Collect feedback on user experience

Phase 3: General Availability

  • Full public launch
  • Maintain monitoring and alerting
  • Be prepared to upgrade or disable the Hook if critical issues arise

Emergency Response Plan

Have a plan for critical issues:

  • Hook Disable: Know how to remove the Hook from an account
  • Transaction Blacklisting: Understand XRPL's amendment process for emergency fixes
  • User Communication: Have channels ready to notify affected users
  • Rollback Strategy: Keep previous Hook versions available

Testing Strategy Recap

Here's your complete QA workflow for XRPL Hooks:

  1. Local Development: Write and test against local xahaud using Jest and xrpl.js
  2. Manual Review: Rigorous code review focusing on security-critical logic
  3. Unit Testing: Verify Hook logic in isolation with comprehensive test cases
  4. Integration Testing: Test Hook interactions with other XRPL features
  5. Testnet Deployment: Full validation on Xahau Testnet
  6. Manual E2E: Real-world testing with Xaman wallet
  7. Security Audit: Professional review by Wasm/XRPL specialists
  8. Phased Mainnet Rollout: Gradual deployment with continuous monitoring

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

❌ Skipping Manual Code Review
Don't rely solely on automated tests. Hooks security requires human expertise.

❌ Testing Only Happy Paths
Edge cases and attack scenarios are where bugs hide. Test failure modes aggressively.

❌ Ignoring Gas Limits
Hooks have execution budgets. Test that your Hook completes within limits.

❌ Deploying Without an Audit
If your Hook manages value, a professional audit is not optional.

❌ No Monitoring Post-Deployment
You need visibility into Hook execution on mainnet to catch issues early.

Next Steps

Ready to start testing? Here's your path forward:

  1. Set Up Your Environment: Follow our Native XRPL Testing Toolkit guide
  2. Learn the Basics: Complete our Your First XRPL Test tutorial
  3. Join the Community: Connect with other Hooks developers on XRPL Discord
  4. Read the Docs: Study the official Hooks documentation

Additional Resources

Summary

Testing Hooks on the Xahau Ledger requires a strategic approach that balances automation with manual review:

  • Automate where possible using Jest and xrpl.js for unit and integration tests
  • Review manually because automated security tools are still maturing
  • Test comprehensively on local testnets before deploying to mainnet
  • Audit professionally before handling real value
  • Monitor continuously after deployment

The tooling ecosystem is evolving rapidly, but the fundamental principle remains: test early, test often, and never skip security review. Your users depend on it.

Happy testing! 🧪🔗

Back to Guides